Satisfaction Priorities Surveys Samples

Satisfaction Priorities Survey Samples and National Comparison Groups

HomeEnrollment Management SolutionsStudent SuccessRNL Satisfaction-Priorities Surveys™Satisfaction Priorities Surveys Samples

Satisfaction-Priorities Surveys

The suite of RNL Satisfaction-Priorities Surveys (SPS) assess both the level of importance and the level of satisfaction that students assign to a variety of statements about their experience.  This combination of data allows an institution to view satisfaction within the context of what truly matters to students.

The survey instruments are comprehensive, capturing the student experience inside and outside of the classroom, including items in such areas as:

  • Instructional effectiveness
  • Academic advising
  • Registration effectiveness
  • Campus climate
  • Recruitment and financial aid

Dive into responses by demographics and satisfaction indicators

In addition, the surveys capture summary satisfaction indicators (which have been linked to individual student retention and institutional graduation rates) as well as standard demographic items which allow for the ability to slice the results by demographic subpopulations.

Add your own customized questions

Each survey version allows for customization with the addition of campus-defined items rated for importance and satisfaction, demographic indicators, and a drop-down list for the majors/programs offered at the institution.

Survey Versions

Select the survey version(s) that is best for the populations you serve.

The ASPS is appropriate for surveying adult students 25 years of age and older at:

  • Undergraduate programs at four-year institutions
  • Graduate programs
  • Evening or weekend programs

Select the file you wish to preview:

The PSOL is designed specifically for online students in either graduate or undergraduate programs at four-year and two-year institutions.

The SSI is appropriate for traditional populations at four-year public and private institutions. You can select either the Form A 70+ item version (most widely used) or the shorter 40+ item Form B version. For an easy comparison of the two surveys review this document.

SSI 4-Year Form A: 70+ items

SSI 4-Year Form B: 40+ items

The SSI is appropriate for students at Community, Junior and Technical Colleges. You can select either the Form A 70+ item version (most widely used) or the shorter 40+ item Form B version. For an easy comparison of the two surveys review this document.

SSI 2-Year Form A:  70+ items

SSI 2-Year Form B: 40+ items

The SSI is appropriate for students at two-year Career and Private Schools. You can select either the Form A 70+ item version or the shorter 40+ item Form B version. For an easy comparison of the two surveys review this document.

SSI Career and Private Form A: 70+ items

SSI Career and Private Form B: 40+ items

The IPS captures the perceptions of the student experience through the eyes of faculty, staff and administrators. The IPS survey version selected should align with the SSI version used.

IPS 4-Year Form A

IPS 2-Year Form A

To assess campus employee satisfaction learn about the College Employee Satisfaction Survey.

Check Prices and Order

Use the link below to review our pricing and place your order!

Order Now

Report Deliverables

 

The results provided clearly identify institutional strengths (items with high importance and high satisfaction) as well as institutional challenges (items with high importance and low satisfaction).

External benchmarking is included at the national and regional level (for the SSI) highlighting where their students may be more or less satisfied than students nationally.

With administrations over multiple years, institutions will see year to year comparisons which reflect where satisfaction levels have shifted significantly over time, allowing colleges to see how their initiatives have improved satisfaction levels.

In addition to providing actionable data for the entire populations, institutions can slice the data on all of the captured demographic variables to identify where there may be areas of greater concern by class level, race/ethnicity, enrollment status, major/programs, etc.  Reviewing the data by demographic subpopulations can provide a clearer picture for initiatives to support student success efforts.

Also see:

  • Particular data elements of the results are going to be relevant for specific departments on campus. Learn more here.
  • The SPS results support multiple efforts on campus, including student success, accreditation, strategic planning and recruitment.

What’s Included

Compare your institution’s survey results to the national comparison group or in some cases a regional comparison group.  Your institutional strengths (items with high importance and high satisfaction) as well as your specific challenges (high importance and low satisfaction) are clearly identified.

The Executive Summary section of this report provides you with a view of the most critical information from your results.  In a few quick steps, you can take screenshots and have high-level results ready to share.

Preview Report Deliverable
 

Compare your most recent survey administration with a previous administration so you can see where satisfaction levels have shifted significantly over time.

The emphasis in reviewing the Year-to-Year Reports should be on the difference column. This allows you to identify where there have been significant improvements in satisfaction over time, as well as to identify where satisfaction levels may be declining in critical areas.

  • Versus Report: Compare two demographic subpopulations to each other, to see where one group may be significantly more or less satisfied than another group (ex: Full-time vs. Part-time). Strengths and Challenges are defined for each demographic variable. This report format is the best location where majors/programs and campus-defined demographic items can be isolated for review.
  • Single Group Report: Allows you to isolate the data by a specific demographic subpopulation and compare it with the corresponding demographic subpopulation on the national level. (ex: Hispanic students at your institution vs. Hispanic students nationally).
  • Comparison Report: Allows you to isolate the data by specific demographic subpopulations to provide you with a better understanding of the perceptions across subsets (ex: Freshman, Sophomore, Junior, Senior).

The raw data are provided as a way to conduct your own in-depth analysis of the results. However, the interactive dashboards offer the calculated analysis most institutions need.

The raw data includes all of the individual responses to each survey item as well as all of the demographic responses. It is the one place that provides the individual record identifier (i.e. student ID, or unique passcode from the online administration), which can be used to append the file with additional information.

The survey provides one space for students to respond to the statement: “Please enter any comments you would like to share with this institution.”

The open-ended comments file delivers the text of the responses verbatim. These provide a starting place to better understand the students’ perceptions of their experience and may point you in the right direction for next steps.

Madison College

“The SSI has been a key metric for us over multiple years. We especially value the ability to benchmark ourselves against two-year institutions nationally.”

Zong Her
Manager, Institutional Research and Effectiveness, Madison College
Clarkson University

“I am very impressed with the suite of services from RNL. Our division uses the data from the Adult Student Priorities Survey to strategically advance a variety of initiatives. We see RNL as a partner and we appreciate the customer service RNL provides.”

Jeffrey Taylor
Associate Vice President for Student Affairs and Global Initiatives, Clarkson University
Florida Polytechnic University

“We are actively working to improve the experience of our students. The SSI is a valuable tool for our campus to identify and monitor key institutional metrics. The data from SSI get used in a lot of different ways at our institution.”

Tom Dvorske
Vice Provost of Academic Affairs, Florida Polytechnic University

Resources for Satisfaction Priorities Surveys